ARP - V Argentina Gold Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARP - V Argentina Gold

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Syncrude who wrote (1990)	1/18/1999 2:29:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) of 3282

Syncrude It may (cost Barrick more) , but remember Lundins rejected $5.50 - so it would have been a hostile bid too. As regards Pascua IMHO it is a stand alone project - they would not have committed hundreds of millions of dollars on the off chance that they would also acquire ARP - bearing in mind that the $s were committted to some time back. This is all somewhat academic because ABX obviously wants to control the area betwen them and ARP and have the mine too. If you pay $5.10 do you get 10% on your money or more? Or, do you only get $5.00? Still not a bad bet? dd

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next