Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kash johal who wrote (46580)	1/18/1999 7:45:00 PM
From: Yougang Xiao	Read Replies (1) of 1573433

Kash: <<If they can only do 350/400 for k-3>> In CC, Jerry said the following in regard to K6-3: k6-3 450 @intro in Q1 big volume of k6-3 in Q2 more than 50% of output in Q4 will be k6-3. From the tone of Jerry's discussion on k6-3, my impression is that k6-3's volume in Q1 would be less than your 350/400K. Maybe somewhere around 100K. As to K6-2, he said "vast majority of Q1 output will be above 350, with heavy population in 400." Further, in responding to J Moore of G&S, Jerry implied 400K of k6-2 @400 mhz on monthly basis is possible. Other than the salvation to be provided by k6-2 450 and k6-3 in Q1, the driving force of stablizing and possibly increasing ASP in Q1 depends on how agressive Intel will pursue celeron 366 and 400's price point.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next