"Not sure if Bow is just taking a day or so due diligence "posting waiver", or if the issue is winding down."
Hi Steve,
I guess I just felt we had kind of beat the issue to death and wasted enough of the thread's cyber space. (Besides, I didn't want to get Dream Weaver pissed at me again :-))
I don't want to look like I'm just into beating heads with the most respected WW, Bernard, transmission, and Zorro. I'm sure everyone of them is twice as smart as I am, so maybe I went a little overboard. We'll never be able to prove anything either way. As I've said, something just smells to me (and to many others considering the number of PM's I was receiving in support of my arguements and encouraging me to continue). I can come up with a whole list of things that "just look funny", but that won't ever prove anything. I suppose just because something looks funny isn't a good enough reason to question someones integrity.
I did enjoy the exchange though and hope some good came of it. And I hope the participants understand it was just in the spirit of education and learning that it was pursued, and there aren't any hard feelings.
Peace,
Steve
PS Regarding my last exchange with Wireless Wonk, he was correct in his calculations. I was wrong in my calculations when I figured WNP's first round bids of $135 to be their gross bids, when it was actually their net bid after bidding credit. Their total first round gross bids were $246.8M and bidding credit used was $98.942M. So his point is well taken. |