SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VVUS: VIVUS INC. (NASDAQ)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: VLAD who wrote (18032)1/22/1999 12:13:00 AM
From: Greg22  Read Replies (1) of 23519
 
Not a bad guess VLAD, except off a little on Cost of Goods.
Here is my overly optimistic estimate based on ideal everything:

domestic ~ $3M
international ~ $12M
total revenue ~ $15M

Cost of Sales ~ $8.0M
R$D ~ $2.0M
SGA ~ $2.0M
total costs ~ $12M

Net income ~ +.09

International sales: I think they are stronger than realized (probably lighter than whats in my calculation, but I want to get my point across). The myopic view that Viagra dominates everywhere is ill conceived. We know that Muse is #1 in Canada, Sweden sales have only dropped 20%,and England sales have rebounded. It is apparent that England and Canada want no part of Viagra. Maybe out of fear of the viagra "body count" or maybe out of fear of bankrupting the system. Most probably a combination of both.

Cost of Sales: A common misconception here is that producing half the product results in half the cost. Not true due to fixed costs.
Thus, the cost of goods you calculate most likely reflects the cost of producing nothing. That is why it is important to have factory running at capacity, marginal unit cost decreases greatly.

R&D: Your guess is as good as mine here. But considering the climate and Vivus is positioning for survival, I am sure Vivus hacked and slashed all they could.

SG&A: I would go as low as $2 Mill here. This is the one cost Vivus can control directly. We know they have restructured, and if done correctly, 50% reduction is not uncommon. I have been through downsizings and restructurings. They are ugly...but the impact on bottom line is incredible.

One important note: while the Street applauds positive earnings that meet expectations, it is important to look at this from an analyst's point of view. Earnings are increasing, but revenues are decreasing. From here on out, there is no more cost cutting. Leland must now either increase revenues in Q2, or prove to the street that he has a plan for doing such. US marketing partner ought to do the trick. But again, patients is essential here. If deal goes sour, or is just plain sub-par, it could have extremely adverse consequences. I would feel most comfortable with Astra due to past track record. Again, I cannot stress the importance for all of us shareholders to wait patiently.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext