aznt already has injunctive relief already meaning the stock already had to be returned.
It means no such thing. Must I ONCE AGAIN run the text of the injunction by you?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CASE NO.CV-S-01247-LDG(RLH)
AMAZON NATURAL TREASURERS INC. [sic], a Nevada Corporation,
TITAN INVESTMENTS a Sole Proprietorship and
GARY SYLVER
Plaintiffs, vs.
JOSEPH ANDY MANN,
FIRST CONCORDE SECURITIES, LTD.,
WHITECLIFFE INVESTMENTS FUND LTD.,
SHORELINE SECURITIES, LTD.,
CANACCORD CAPITAL CORP.,
CITIBANK, and
JB OXFORD
Defendants.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants J.B. OXFORD and CANACCORD CAPITAL CORPORATION be and hereby are enjoined from trading, selling, transferring, assigning or otherwise hypothecating any or all of the common shares in the capital stock of the plaintiff, AMAZON NATURAL TREASURERS, INC. [sic] held to the credit of accounts in the name of the defendant FIRST CONCORDE SECURITIES, LTD. at the defendants J.B. OXFORD or CANACCORD CAPITAL CORPORATION or either of them; except that the defendants J.B. OXFORD and CANACCORD CAPITAL CORPORATION, or either of them, are at liberty to deposit certificates representing such shares or any of them with any court of competent jurisdiction by way of interpleader or similar proceedings.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the injunction granted herein, and its continued operation, be and hereby is, conditional upon the plaintiff AMAZON NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. [sic] not taking any action that results in a short position or positions in common shares in the capital stock of the plaintiff AMAZON NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.[sic] being asserted against the defendants J.B. OXFORD and CANACCORD CAPITAL CORPORATION, or either of them, through any stock depository or clearing house or system, or otherwise.
Dated this 2 day of October, 1998.
I thought you'd finally understood what this mean, but I see I was wrong.
today we learned that "compromise" was , again, for aznt to make statement that 1.2 million of the shares @ dtc are free trading shares.
Let's cut to the chase: in point of actual fact the DTC's position hasn't changed even slightly since the outset.
since there are no material issues in dispute since the defendants have not responded, pleaded or defend this action, the court will award in judgement what the plaintiff seeks, the 4.48 million shares. then federal marshalls will seize this stock.
From whom?
this same fbna group is calling shareholders "promoters" regardless of the company janice now keeps in her concerted effort to manipulate the aznt market.
And just what company is that? Really, I'm curious.
And by the way, Gary, have you ever signed a contract with AZNT that goes beyond your distribution agreement with the company? |
