Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Lacelle who wrote (29138)	1/22/1999 10:42:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (3) of 67261

Right. On the "integrity" front, I noticed in the Wed. WSJ at the library, the notion that Nixon would have likely won a Senate trial is still being pushed. Talk about revisionist history. I'll have to check out The Final Days again sometime, but I think that it confirmed the story that Goldwater told Nixon he had maybe 10-12 votes to acquit in the Senate, and those votes didn't include Goldwater. There's lots of sleaze in politics. Given the documented lying of Rehnquist, Hyde, Barr, and Lott, and the history of the "secret" Starr Grand Jury proceedings, raising Clinton about the crowd of his detractors seems questionable to me. Then there's that other issue of the Iran-Contra cover up that never ended. What more do you want to know about Lewinsky et. al. anyway?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next