SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The picks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: James Colter who wrote (3495)1/30/1997 11:10:00 PM
From: Andrew Vance   of 6124
 
*AV* PRIVATE and PERSONAL RESPONSE (Please respect request)

Cut the crap yourself James. You are trying to incite a riot. There are those of us that question your existence and are aware of some inflammatory comments you have made elsewhere. Your comments are boarding on rude!

<SHAWN, For you to apologize to ANYBODY is ABSURD!!!>
<Didn't you post CSGI when it was $7.00 ?> YES HE DID!!

<I bought in Why didn't ANDREW?>

BECAUSE NO ONE COULD!!! IT WAS SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN THAT WHEN IT WAS POSTED(but not by much). I did buy in and I sold and bought and sold and bought!!!! I have made $$$ off this stock.

< He's a grown boy, he can make his own decisions. Now that the stock is lost $2.00 everyone is having a COW!>

You are sounding like a Shawn clone here. He has already informed everyone that they need to make their own decisions. I am not having a cow over the price of CSGI. As a matter of fact, I posted numerous strategies for buying the stock down in order to recoup gains faster as the stock rose. this would allow a faster exit point for me without dramatically affecting the exit price needed by others. Shawn has also concurred with that strategy. No one has complained about CSGI, some have grown tired and impatient relative to its upward mobility.

<Is it your fault that they didn't buy in when you posted it ?>

Again you are trying to incite a riot here. No fault was assessed and no fault was assigned to or against anyone.

<When MEDY goes to $6.00 and someone buys in is it your fault that they waited until the price rose ? HELL NO.>

Why not mention PSTA in this comment and given Shawn the benefit of his 2 stock picks today? Shawn did not pick $6 as a target. I beleive he picked a range in price. No one has assessed or insinuated fault here either. No one is blaming Shawn. Again inflammatory comments.

<I personally have benefited in the tune of $18,500 from you picks. It would of been more if I would of played those PRGS options last expiration, but I didn't understand what you were saying.>

Again bringing up the past is not necessary. We are all aware of the $ 18,500 you have made on Shawn's picks. If you go back to your original post when you made that comment you will find a long time has past since then. Therefore, I assume you have not made any money since that time. I find that if all this time has passed by and you haven't made more money, it must mean your investments are stagnating a trifle also. Why are you not a little antsy like the rest of us?

<I didn't think that you should start a new thread, but due to all this CRAP I think you should start a thread that is ONLY about your picks and nothing else. You have been to patient of all the "noise" on this thread.>

Again you are inciting another riot here and instigating a non constructive fight. This isn't the first time comments like this were made concerning this thread. What is your purpose here, to incite a riot and throw gasoline on a fire? Is it your intention to chase Shawn away onto another thread?? Shawn is a big boy and has not been as offended as you have over this matter. Why are you taking such great offense when he has not? If he is pissed off, he would most certainly say so.

And why did you contact me to go over to another thread such that I would be privvy to information that has no place on this or any other thread and could be considered to have been an attempt on your part to try and have me discredit someone. And why did you seek my counsel on the information from that thread? I have checked back on that thread and have found some interesting comments recently. I will not allow you to trash this thread and give you the satisfaction of a verbal barrage of epithets.

Everyone on this thread is behaving by a code of conduct and as long as the parties involved do not take offense, you most certainly should not. Shawn and the rest of us have a mutual respect for each other and we hope that you will abide by that code of conduct. If not, my suggestion is for you to email Shawn with your return email address and you can converse with him privately, out of our perview. No one on this thread wants anyone to withdraw from this forum so why are you so insistent on provoking this and why are you so fast to come to Shawn's defense when it is real apparent he does not need a knight in shining armor?

Finally, I know there will be a rebuttal to this but it will end there. I will not respond again to anything more on this subject matter. So, if as you have done in the past, let the venom flow. You have a free shot because there will be no response.

The ball is in your court, sir. Civility or notoriety. Personally, I think you need to apoligize to all the members of this thread for your unpleasant comments and apologize to Shawn. I want nor need any apology from you. I will not continue to play a game that seems to bring you great joy. I also bear you no ill will and hope you make $18,500 more money on Shawn's and everyone else's picks.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext