Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: L. D. who wrote (3018)	1/23/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: jetfighter_09	Read Replies (1) of 5164

Ken Good post Ken. My thoughts for what it's worth. 1. If GLB was negotiating with Sungold, why post legal matters to shareholders? What purpose other than to frighten shareholders? The reason to scare shareholders could be in part because of their weak legal position. Therefore they are relying on SI to manipulate shareholders to achieve their goal. Let us be prudent in how we react to post 3002. Their action is equivalent to a union and a company signing an agreement. One side rethinks their position and then goes to the MEDIA, making the other side looks so SINISTER that the agreement is renegotiated to avoid bad publicity. (poor negotiating ploy) 2. If the Michigan casino is just around the corner, it sure makes me wonder. Could someone be trying to shake out some cheap shares ie .10 - .50 cents? 3. <<<I have spoken twice to the company, and they were not aware of this situation at all.>>> 3002 posts and the shorts (AMF) are making like it's factual? Hhmmmm. They are usually asking the questions. It doesn't seem like it this time and it doesn't make sense. 4. Too many unanswered questions. I'll wait until management has a chance at bat.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next