SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 226.05+1.3%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Katherine Derbyshire who wrote (27860)1/23/1999 12:31:00 AM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (3) of 70976
 
<<How long did bookings take to recover in 1985?>>

I don't know. The historical bookings data on the SEMI website does not go back that far.

I'm not saying that bookings are guaranteed to recover lost ground within any specified period of time. I don't think it's necessary to know how fast the recovery will be, only that we are in a recovery.

<<As I've been saying for months, this downturn is really the *extension* of 1997, not the successor.>>

That may be true for the DRAM industry, but when equipment bookings double over a fourteen month period, as they did from Sept. 96 to Nov. 97, it's hard to think of that as a mere blip.

<<1997 behavior is extremely unlikely to be a good model.>>

I don't think it pays for either semiconductor equipment executives or their investors to get hung up on whether customers are ordering for the right reasons. The equipment companies have to take the orders when they can get them, and the investors have to take the profits when they can get them, without worrying about whether the industry is achieving some mythical nirvana model of sustained, steady growth.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext