SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (2743)1/23/1999 1:58:00 AM
From: Brad  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
"Digital terrestrial TV needs a huge system of transformers which consume much more energy than the satellite we use which gets its power directly from the sun."

Show me the "huge system of transformers". What in blazes is this person claiming? It is either the sort of blatant socialist lie typical of most greenhouse gas arguments, or some other type of mental delusion.

Maybe they were referring to the distribution amplifiers needed for a coaxial cable system. These are needed both for digital and for analog systems.

Of course, the above quoted statement conveniently evades making any informed comparison between the satellite receiver and the digital cable settop, whose function is nearly identical once one gets past the satellite receiver's low-noise amplifier and first mixer.

It is clearly a good thing for home electronics to consume little to no power when not actually in use.

It is irresponsible, though, to make blanket claims (16 watt standby power consumption) without supporting data. Show me the data.

My ire is directed not at Mr. Coluccio, but at whatever fool wrote the original article.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext