VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Curtis who wrote (7387)	1/23/1999 2:15:00 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (2) of 27311

"Their vested interested blinded them. " What vested interest did Motorola have to protect against lithium polymer batteries? You don't make sense. Motorola had a vested interest in VLNC's success. Motorola had a very close look at VLNC and said no thanks. It is as much aware of VLNC now as it was in 1993. As for analogy, mine was to IBM vs. Microsoft and Wang/IBM/DEC against Apple. Keep your MOT example and try again. As for Barron's journalism, while you are checking, look at the article touting VLNC before the first failure to deliver. One more thing, it turns out the Annual Report you apparently shudder to mention by name contained all of the factual information anyone needed to know to predict that VLNC would tank by more than 50% afterwards. Could it happen again? ASk "nimble John" afterwards. Who among you would have thought it possible that a Barron's report in late January 1999 would be able to report what it has about the state of the lith poly sector? Vendetta against VLNC? Your view John.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next