I'm new to this thread, but have been reading all the posts. Regarding post # 485 (i.e., implying that JENE is required for JINI), I think that Sharewatcher needs to admit that a mistake was made in order to regain credibility. Without credibility, it just becomes hype that will be taken with a grain of salt.
Now, the October 22, 1998 PR newswire of INSGY stated "A few small competitors are offering a Java environment for embedded systems , but they are stripped down, lite versions that do not offer the full compatibility to deliver the basic Java promis to 'write once, run anywhere.' Our solution does...".
I think this implies that Jene is not required for Jini, but that Jene is clearly the best solution out there.
With patent protection thus filed, the best solution for Jini thus becomes a lock for Insignia.
Happy trading, see you on easy street when all hell breaks loose!!!
Note -- I bought INSGY at 6.25 in 1997, then sold at 2. Bought in again at 6 last week -- hope it's not going to be a deja-vu!!!! |
