SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Machaon who wrote (10455)1/24/1999 6:39:00 PM
From: jimpit  Read Replies (1) of 13994
 
<"The Republican Party will find out the hard way when we have the "Trial of the Millennium" ..... The American People vs Republican Party at the polls in 2000"!">

Robert,

I've noticed you using this this line in a few of your posts.

I have a very different view. I tend to believe the results of a strict party line vote to acquit will end up HAMMERING the Dems in 2000.

Think about it...

If Slick remains in office because the Dems block-vote to acquit, they'll (the Dems) be extremely nervous for two years, for fear that something else will turn up about Slick or Mz Slick and prove beyond a shadow of a doubt to the world that the Slicks are simply NOT presidential-class citizens.

Do you REALLY believe Slick can be scandal free for two whole years without stepping on his crank ? I don't think so...!

Then, when he does screw up, or when the rest of his (or Mz. Slick's) crimes finally comes home to roost... like the FBI Files, Travel Office fiasco, or even campaign finance shenanagans..., the Reps will have all those great video clips of all the Dems saying what great folks the Slicks are, and that they should remain in office, blah, blah, blah... Oowwee! What a rout that'll be!

Here's a good editorial about that subject from Florida. Lotta votes in Florida, huh?

-----------------------------------------------

Florida Times-Union
Sunday, January 24, 1999
OPINION

IMPEACHMENT: A dozen Democrats


If Democrat senators vote en bloc to retain President Clinton in office, it will
stain the party forever.

It is assumed by pundits that all 55 Republicans will vote to convict, although
that conclusion seems a little premature at this point.

If that should happen, however, the votes of 12 Democrats would be needed for
conviction.

Because of the powerful presentation by the House prosecutors, the senators can
have little doubt that Clinton lied and obstructed justice.

Step by step, the prosecutors showed how the White House was galvanized into
action upon finding that Monica Lewinsky was to be called as a witness in the
Paula Jones lawsuit.

Phone calls from the Oval Office to Vernon Jordan and Betty Currie and from
Currie to Lewinsky cannot be explained in any context favorable to the president.
Nor could his Sunday meeting with Currie during which he clearly coached her
to lie on the witness stand.

What senators will have to decide is what to do about the president's felonious
activities.

Clinton Loyalist Sen. Tom Harkin, DIowa, has said, ''Just because a president
commits a crime does not mean, ipso facto, that he should be removed from
office.''

That might be suitable for Richard Nixon's epitaph.

Public opinion polls are Clinton's life raft, and the air is leaking.

The polls, which were in Clinton's favor at a time when few people were
following the case and when the Dow was soaring to record heights, began
moving against Clinton as the details were revealed - until he giddily proposed
giving away $288 billion a year and got a quick opinion fix.

Because of his reliance on polls, if the balance should tip to a majority in favor of
removal, Democratic defenders would have nothing left to cling to. Already, a
majority in one poll say Clinton deserves to be removed.

The sad part - for the nation, not the president - is that all of this could have been
avoided.

Throughout his career, Clinton has been able to use his husky voice to talk his
way out of trouble. He was so convinced it would work in this case that he
missed an opportunity.

Had he acknowledged the Lewinsky affair a year ago, it is doubtful that he would
have been impeached and therefore would not be on trial.

The worst would have been three days of headlines and - maybe - some nightly
news notice on TV.

Still, the consummate risk-taker may yet escape the ignominy of being the only
president removed from office.

The Senate could show mercy. Since a finding of guilt would require removal
from office, it may choose not to convict because enough senators believe
removal from office is too severe.

But if it falls on party lines, the narrow escape will be seen as a partisan rescue
of a guilty president.


Then it becomes Clinton's legacy and the Democratic Party's albatross.

------------------------------------------------------

This site, and all its content, © The Florida Times-Union 1999

jacksonville.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext