Canadian Options Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Canadian Options

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: william smith who wrote (94)	1/31/1997 5:01:00 PM
From: Barron Von Hymen	of 1598

The link to MX is that NVA owns a large percentage of MX stock. MX stock goes down when it's feed (natural gas) goes up, but NVA's price is linked to the performance of natural gas. Confusing? Well all this means to me is that considering brokerage firms ratings on MX, and NVA, I'd play both by just buying NVA, using options to hedge my positions. Unfortunately I don't agree with the outlook on Cameco, so you're on your own with this one. $75 twelve month(Nesbitt Burns) by target is a little extravagant. $100 by Midland, then is outrageous in comparison. Tell me what would make the price of uranium jump that high? The best to you on Cameco, and the best to us on NVA and ABX. :> But to tell you the truth, I maintain my previous statements on the economy (neutral/bearish on Gold) and consistent with that ABX is the smallest of my holdings.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next