Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (29704)	1/25/1999 12:16:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) of 67261

And what, exactly, makes you thing Paula Jones was "sincere in wanting vindication"? Vindication from what? The vague "Paula" reference in the American Spectator article? That was planted by people who "helped" in the lawsuit? It all seems a bit convoluted to me, like the House voting down the perjury in the Jones deposition article but voting for perjury about perjury in the "secret" Grand Jury testimony. I think Bill Vaughn's explanation is a lot more likely about what was going on with the Jones suit than Jones seeking "vindication": Be happy to have GOP die if that's what it takes to defeat Clinton, the anti-Christ.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next