<<B: The trooper was under the impression that she had "done" Clinton>>
As I recall, the article in the Am. Spectator reported the trooper remembering that a woman named Paula, after "doing" Clinton, had specifically verbally offered to him to be Clinton's "regular girlfriend". Her complaint in this instance would therefore seem to be with the trooper's account and with whomever was responsible for publishing it (we'll give you 3 guesses here Neocon). However, guileless-emotional-reaction-wise, apparently Bill Clinton, the President of the United States of America, married to Hillary Rodham Clinton, should have immediately called an internationally televised press conference to announce that: however many other Arkansas women named Paula may have "done" him during his time as Governor there, Paula Corbin Jones not only never "did" him but, in addition, having been given an opportunity to visually survey the task of "doing" him, had firmly refused to do so.
I do find it a little disconcerting to jump from "he won't vindicate me by admitting that I never did him" to "I have suffered because I was ostracized in the office for not doing him". In the latter case we have to believe that Bill Clinton actually managed to carry out anything (the vindictive campaign to punish PCJ for not "doing" him) in relative secrecy. Like, what are the chances? Of course, he may already have murdered all the potential witnesses, so who knows. |
