-------More questions in addition to my previous questions---
Mr./Mrs. Coffee Pot:
You stated:
"....PNLK is purchasing everyday ordinary services from ATT available to ANYONE...plain and simple........."
1. Please define what are "every day ordinary services"?
2. Please also state whether the specific rates offered ie purchased through PNL for these "everyday ordinary services" are greater to, equal to or less than these same exact services can be obtained without using PNL's web site and tools?
3. Are you stating that PNL is purposely trying to deceive investors
by using ..."the term"...partnership ..."VERY loosely" ?
=======================
Now again my previous questions...
5. Are you stating that PNL (ProNetLink) is willfully trying to deceive investors with its latest press release? Are you somehow trying to infer that PNL isn't a "legit" operation?
6. What is the basis for your conclusions? ie. How do you specifically know what the exact terms are or are not between a stated partnership between AT&T and PNL? Please provide everyone with your links and resources?
======================
Now regarding "your opinion"......
There is a distinct and clear difference between opinion and libel...
I can say you are ugly. That may be just an "opinion"
However, if I say you are ugly, and you are a model, and my statement adversely effects you're earning potential or dissuades some one, an investor or business, from being interested in you, that is more than opinion, that is libel..
Thus, when you state in, or not in, your opinion.....
"Today's news is, in my opinion, a NON-EVENT....what most people think of a partnership and how the word is legally defined can and is creating confusion.....in this case the term is being used VERY loosely...."
You are potentially committing libel, especially if you incessantly feel the need to repeat your solitary point, and you are either unwilling or unable to answer the simple questions I've posed to you.
Thus I ask you one additional question "Mr/Mrs Pot",
Are you purposely trying to dissuade people from purchasing shares in this company by your repetitive posts and unsubstantiated claims?
If you are sincere, you would have realized that you have made your point and don't need to repeat it over and over..
Now if you are sincere, and you have nothing else to contribute, I'd suggest you "legally" define the difference between libel and opinion, rather than conjecture on the specific terms of a partnership which you couldn't possibly know.
Sincerely,
the warden of
the Cyberian Gulag,
ztect
|
