SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Neocon who wrote (29880)1/26/1999 2:03:00 AM
From: Jack Be Quick  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
How true Neocon. PCJ's lawyers might have deposed the office managers involved in these matters (seating assignments, flower arrangements, etc.), but who knows? Still, if Bill Clinton did engage in this alleged campaign of "petty harassment" against PCJ, it appears to be the only thing he ever managed to do surreptitiously while Governor of Arkansas. I find that kind of ironic.

But you will recall that this was not Paula Jone's original public complaint against Clinton. Her original complaint was that he was (is) a cad for not publicly restoring her honor by acknowledging that he showed her his dick in an unsolicited and unwelcome way. (The suffering from harassment allegations came later.) Which brings us back to the point where we began: that it was the Am. Spectator article and the trooper's account of events that publicly besmirched her character to begin with. And the point of the article that was posted here earlier is that it appears that both the Am. Spectator article and the trooper's story were financed and brought to light by the same group that assisted Paula Jones in her effort to regain her public honor after the story was published. Some might consider that a neo-convenient and neo-curious turn of events.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext