Well, Ellen, that's what you said
First you posted this:
exchange2000.com
In which you remarked "that door swings both ways". I'm not really sure what door you mean, as I referenced no door in the message to which you were responding:
exchange2000.com
May we, then, assume that you were just inventing this door, or, perhaps, hinting at its existence? You offer no details, yet specify that it's a swinging door. A door that swings in more than one direction. You said, in fact, "that door swings both ways":
exchange2000.com
On June 16, 1997, "Joseph G" wrote:
exchange2000.com
To which I replied:
exchange2000.com
You don't seem to want to discuss that, but then you always think you can control the conversation. Never mind. Let's move on to the REALLY IMPORTANT PART of:
exchange2000.com
"And you're dizzy". Are we to assume that "I" was "swinging" in so violent a manner as to become dizzy? NO!! It was the "DOOR" that was swinging:
Cogito; ergo sum portam. |
