SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Clayton Williams Energy (CWEI) OIL
CWEI 131.900.0%Apr 25 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Buzz Mills who wrote (344)2/1/1997 1:26:00 PM
From: Buzz Mills   of 1017
 
An Email Sent to Zacks----Dear Zacks,

In regards to Clayton Williams Energy (CWEI), and earnings estimates for fiscal '96 and '97, there is one brokerage firm whose estimates aren't even in the ballpark and I would urge Zacks to give serious consideration to deleting that estimate from the consensus; it creates a definite distortion and is an insult to everyone concerned.

Morgan Freeman has an estimate of $1.15 for fiscal year '96. Paine Webber estimates $1.78 for '96, Hanifen's has $1.66 for '96, and Rodman, Renshaw has $1.60 for '96. To allow an estimate of $1.15 to exist is a travesty against good earnings reporting, something which Zacks is allegedly noted for. CWEI will earn 0.70 in the fourth quarter alone on top of the 0.96 already earned, plus an additional 0.16 for a second quarter writedown.

Morgan Freeman has an estimate of $0.80 for fiscal year '97. Paine Webber estimates $1.25 for '97, Hanifen's has $1.27 for '97, and Rodman, Renshaw has $1.13 for '97. Again to allow this obvious disparity to exist is an insult to Clayton Williams Energy, to Zacks, to the stockholders, and is also a reflection on Morgan Freeman.

Zacks should be in a position to either:
1) Require Morgan Freeman to provide a legitimate earnings estimate, or
2) Drop the Morgan Freeman estimate from Zack's consensus.

Sincerely,
Buzz Mills
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext