Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rogue Warrior who wrote (3076)	1/26/1999 11:48:00 PM
From: David Carruthers	Read Replies (1) of 5164

Hi Rogue, I hope this post doesn't come back to haunt me, but IMO, the last thing the company should do is publicly comment on or acknowledge an anonymous message floating around in cyber-space, no matter how troubling the "content" of the "message". If what appeared in 3002 arrived at SGGNF's corp. HQ on the paperwork of a law firm, well then that would be different. But to give public credibility to SI postings by having the company address them just seems the wrong approach. I think it would be amateurish and unprofessional and it would look like a panicked, knee-jerk response. Sure it would make us all feel good IN THE SHORT TERM to have a public comment, but in the LONG RUN it would work against us. I called the co. yesterday, and was told in no uncertain terms that the contract between SGGNF and the band is solid and for real. For the time being, I'll take the word of the company over a weasly-worded SI posting like 3002. Take care, David PS. Having said all that, if the co. does respond, it won't be the end of the world. I would just prefer that it didnt.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next