Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (47491)	1/27/1999 2:29:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (6) of 1571778

Linley Gwennap's response to my e-mail: Thanks for the response. I can't address every point you raise, and certainly we will have to disagree in some areas. There are some assumptions I have to make, without having been briefed in on Willamette, that may turn out to be in error. If so, I will be happy to retract them at the appropriate point in the future. Please be assured that I did have official Intel representatives review this article, and they declined to point out any errors. Regarding AMD, please consider that I may have information about the K7's performance that has not been made public. I agree that AMD could fail to execute on the K7, as it has with previous processors. Then again, it might not. The point I tried to make in the editorial is that Intel shouldn't be counting on AMD to fail. Intel should have a clearly superior technology. If Intel takes market share from AMD with superior technology, I doubt the FTC will do anything about it. Well, Mr. Gwennap has been more than fair. I wonder what kind of secret information he has on K7's performance. He seems confident that the K7 can take the lead over anything that Intel can introduce before Willamette. Tenchusatsu

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next