SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (45577)1/27/1999 10:09:00 AM
From: rupert1  Read Replies (1) of 97611
 
I thought Mason's brief statement used language more understandable to the investment community than some used yesterday.

1. Alta Vista has already been incorporated as a company. It is this company which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of COMPAQ.

2. Alta Vista will gear up its operations in anticipation of an IPO. The date of the IPO will be determined by progress in getting ready, as well as the readiness of the market to buy the shares.

3. The equity structure of the new IPO has not been decided, although COMPAQ will retain a controlling share. Another way of saying this is that it is a "partial spin-off" - a minority proportion of the shares will be offered to the public.

4. The issue of whether COMPAQ shareholders will get shares in the new IPO has not been raised by the company. All the company has said is that the IPO will "unlock shareholder value". This would be the case if the IPO raises billions of dollars to grow a publicly traded Alta Vista in which COMPAQ owns a controlling interest. There are very good shareholder-friendly reasons for not giving COMPAQ shareholders shares in the new IPO. The more shares available to the public, the more dollars COMPAQ can raise. Also, it may be necessary to give shares to some large content providers.

5. Mason's words and body language when he said he was comfortable with the estimates of the investment community for this year, made it clear that COMPAQ wll exceed those estimates comfortably and suggested he agreed with the Paine Webber analysis that estimates of $1.75 represetn a serious underestiamte of the value of the company.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News