SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 33.63-4.2%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (72252)1/27/1999 2:25:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Slick - Re: " Fact is, nobody can tell the difference between a 500 Mhz and a 400 Mhz processor (besides the price.)"

Now there you go again, Slippery !

You claimed MHz was real important for the AMD K7 .

But now that Intel has 500 MHz Pentium IIIs out, MHz is not important.

I suppose a SLippery Slick like you thinks AMD has different laws of physics that apply to their chips, eh?

Your Slick reversals remind us all of somebody we see on TV a lot - a guy with a lot of lawyers on his payroll.

Paul

{==========================================}
o: Paul Engel (46202 )
From: Scumbria
Friday, Jan 15 1999 1:15PM ET
Reply #46206 of 47550

Paul,

excuses

Intel's failure to develop an x86 core targeted for high MHz will cost them dearly. AMD showed the foresight to develop K7.

Does a 1GHz x86 CPU early next year sound like an excuse to you?

Scumbria

{=======================================}
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News