Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (30510)	1/28/1999 2:20:00 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) of 67261

Hicks and Clinton's cases are different. What makes them different is the underlying behavior. Hicks was forcing himself upon subordinates, Clinton was encouraged by his partner. You must look to the heart of the matter in each case to see if it is bad enough for removal. In Hick's case there is indication that he would cause great disruption to his staff. In Clinton's case, had the behavor continued the worse that may happen would be a stain on the rug. TP think sex is always bad and dirty It is by the Radical's deeds that this can be deduced.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next