BNEZ and PMA; Success in 1999 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BNEZ and PMA; Success in 1999

BNEZ 0.00

Sep 18 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tRaDiAc who wrote (2074)	1/28/1999 10:28:00 PM
From: heatseeker	Read Replies (2) of 2648

On the AOL case....... Secondopinion (from RB) and I were discussing this via email. If AOL were concerned about the information that BNEZ got from the depositions, it would make sense for them to be buying BNEZ shares like crazy right now. Because, if they felt BNEZ got some incriminating evidence via the depositions, then it would be in AOL's best interest to settle with BNEZ. And of course, once the settlement became public, BNEZ shares would soar, and AOL would be able to at least partially offset the cost of the settlement by selling their BNEZ shares (which were bought very cheaply). Since obviously AOL (nor anyone else) has not been buying up BNEZ shares, AOL must not be concerned and has no intention of settling with BNEZ. So I hope no one gets disappointed when AOL is granted summary judgment and there is no settlement for BNEZ. I just hope BNEZ did not invest too heavily in this litigation, and still has money left to market PMA......which I'm sure they do. It personally will not bother me........I will be glad to see this behind us and soon become a reporting company. Comments? heatseeker

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next