SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!!
DGIV 0.00Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: William Brotherson who wrote (37365)1/29/1999 9:07:00 AM
From: Ronaldo  Read Replies (1) of 50264
 
Bill:
bashers and the fob's (friends of bashers) are despicable people who seem to make a living from predatory practices, or act out predatory practices.

Most of us here are people that did "panic buying" (my average, for example is $3.25[enjoy it Jane ;-)) The people that "gave us a hand" at buying the share (it was our own decision to buy), do not post here anymore.....

So, basically it is us, the leftovers, the suckers, "the panic buyers that should have become panic sellers" that are left (and I guess some new players). This should be self evident for people who have followed the thread as long as Jane, for example.

Now I have been able to find strength in weakness by understaznding that Jimmy Chin is real, that Digitcom [DGIV] is real and, IMHO, will be one of the best "up and coming" internet-tech stories in the market.

So, if it is evident that we are the leftovers, that we are not the pumpers of this stock, why do these people prey on us? This rethorical question has two aspects:
1.- in terms of DGIV specifically, it has not been an "sexy stock" for a long while.......
2.- In terms of the many pumped up stocks that appear every day.

What is the point of "rethorically" hitting people in the head all the time except to demoralize them? To this there are two answers, IMO:
1.-for economic reasons
2.-for personal, pathological, reasons

Coffee Pot seems to fall in category #1, McGinnis seems to fall in #2

I have a hard time accepting this supposedly "politically correct" posture of being hit and kindly putting the other cheek, and when I run out of cheeks, welll... then just cease posting...and when I feel disengaged from the share and the small world around it...well take my losses and leave...WHY?

I have a position to defend, an investment to stand up for. I believe in it. I don't hype the stock, I don't ask anyone to buy it, I just try to give (and receive) moral support to/from those that are in the same boat as I.

Also I honestly think that because some of us remained firm this share did not fall further. As Analyst10 predicted, we were supposed to become a "$0.25 share".

A last point. I think McGinnis is a sick person, his posts regarding his visits to playgrounds was "amazing" I am aware that there are pathological individuals, but that a person actually posts this stuff, feels righteous and justified in his claimed actions and, additionally makes it public is really bizare.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext