Where, exactly, have I been uncivil with you? Aside from one passing, relatively mild remark? Yes, I've been a bit unkind about your evaluation of the sincerity of Paula Jones, but in a rough and tumble game like this, it strains credulity to say that somehow, Paula Jones is the naive waif in the whole deal. Besides, if she was so fragile, isn't her distress due to Smith, Porter, Brock, and the troopers as much as to Clinton? Or were the troopers and others just telling the "truth" now, in some alternate but equally acceptable version, as opposed to the despicable Clinton? Please explain.
As for conservatism upholding standards of behavior, you will, indeed, have to take that up with Vaughn, JLA, Pilch et. al. They're for truth and justice and I'm the partisan hater. Of course, in their peculiar world of truth and justice, Clinton is the antichrist, and whatever it takes to bring him down is "fair". I appreciate your relative civility, Neocon, but I don't exactly consider you guileless here either. |
