SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (47905)1/30/1999 12:24:00 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (1) of 1571123
 
With all this talk over the impact of Merced and that blasted six-month delay (you can tell I'm not happy over the Merced delay), the fact is that Merced is going to such a low volume market compared to Pentium or K6/K7.

Merced was initially expected in late 1997, so it will be almost three years late at introduction.

While the introduction of the P7 (now referred to as Merced) being
co-developed by Inteland Hewlett-Packard Co. is at least a year away,
speculation abounds on just what this new architecture will do.

Merced is expected to be released in late 1997 and volume production probably
will not kick in until 1998. However, industry experts already are furiously
debating the impact Merced could have on competing chip vendors, especially
the RISC camp.

techweb.com

Sources briefed by the Santa Clara, Calif., chip giant said the company plans to
release Klamath-the next-generation Pentium Pro-in the fourth quarter, followed
by Deschutes in the second half of 1997.

The chips are named after rivers in Oregon and California. For example, the
upcoming P7 chip-due out in early 1998-is called Merced. And a top-secret chip
in development is called Tillamook, a river near Intel's sprawling facilities in
Hillsboro, Ore.

techweb.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext