PSFT - Fiscal 1998 - Discussion for the next year Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : PSFT - Fiscal 1998 - Discussion for the next year

PSFT 0.0001000

0.0%

Oct 29 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Melissa McAuliffe who wrote (4466)	1/30/1999 3:06:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) of 4509

Is it really all that different than when SAP formed that company with INTC to develop web software of whatever it was? Oh yeah, the Pandesic boondoggle. Well, I just glossed over that because it was a consortium which means 2 things to me 1) they needed expertise from 2 or more distinct technology areas to meet the objective and 2) it wont be successful mostly due to reason 1. I never knew what pandesic was doing or why intel was there, but then, neither did they. Anyway I see your point, but somehow when something doesnt involve 2 distinct partners you wonder why they dont just do it in-house. But again, psft has always been above board and unless I see something that really looks questionable Im going to give them the benefit of the doubt. If anybody here knows who is in momentum and what they are doing please post, btw. It should be light on management Im hoping. Michelle

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next