Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (31068)	1/30/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) of 67261

They don't mean more to me because I consider the background of the Paula Jones suit relevant. It was a highly partisan matter right from the start. You say, lying for reasons of state about covert operations are judged differently than lying to protect one's butt. In a strictly personal matter. The counterargument, in brief, is that yes, the first is more serious. Just an opinion, I'm not a moral absolutist. Cheers, Dan. P.S. My recollection on Barr and the white supremacists is that he made a keynote address or something. Saying he didn't know what he was doing is suspect.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next