>Yeah, I just checked Martindale-Hubbell, and Tiefer's not there.
>I shoulda done that before. So who is he? Just another Spidey
>invention?
The documents of the recent lawsuit against Amazon indicate that Tiefer made a loan, using the 224,000 shares as collateral, and that the loan defaulted passing ownership of the shares to Tiefer (actually, his company NexTech). Since he believed that the shares were worth something as collateral, I would speculate that he is not a related party to the Amazon dealings. As I flip back through elements of this thread, it seems that any party with knowledge of Amazon would be concerned about such stock.
From your previous post, it seems that Kricfalusi received stock as partial compensation, and since this probably didn't happen at the _end_ of his career with Amazon, the Rule 144 restriction would likely have expired by now. Is this the stock Spider was referring to?
Spider, you mentioned a previous suit between Tiefer and Kricfalusi. Do you have a case number, or an approximate timeframe and jurisdiction on that suit? I am developing a sort of morbid fascination in this company's doings, something like understanding how viruses work (which is more along my professional line).
Level Head |
