SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Discuss Year 2000 Issues

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: C.K. Houston who wrote (3511)1/31/1999 7:03:00 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh  Read Replies (5) of 9818
 
C.K., from your post

BIG problem in the plants. Some chips have to change. Since plants were built, size of chip has changed. So, motherboard has to change too. Problem is, motherboard is affixed to valve ... so valves have to be replaced. Problem goes a few more levels beyond.

The above quote just does not pass the smell test. I spent 30 years constructing sewage and water treatment plants, pumping stations, etc. the largest of which were essentially fully automated and contained hundreds, if not thousands, of process control valves. I have never encountered an automated valve (nor can I envision one) where a problem with the controls of the valve actuator would require changing a valve. Although nothing is impossible this is one case where I would have to see it to believe it. If true, it is extremely rare.

Another problem I have is trying to understand why so many seemingly intelligent people posting on this thread seem to filter out and discard the mounting evidence that the Y2K problem is being brought under control. When I found the following article it did help me to understand the phenomenon.

mcs.net

Al
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext