Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Catfish who wrote ()	2/1/1999 4:44:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) of 13994

Oral sex is sex. The phrase in fact must include the word Sex- or we wouldn't know the context for the word "oral" at all- both words are essential to understand the meaning of the phrase). If a person engages in deep kissing on a particular occasion, he/she might tell a buddy about it, and the general sense of the telling, indeed the REASON for the telling, would normally suffice to relate(with gleam in eye)that some SEXUAL CLOSENESS(a key concept, of course!) had been achieved. I'm confident that authorities and common folks alike know darn well that these activities are indeed sexual in nature- and would answer a properly worded survey thusly. The President admitted he tried to hide the truth yet claimes to believe he did so in a legal manner. This cannot be so. The concept of the "whole truth" couldn't be more relevant here. It was the Presidents responsibility to consider it fully. Despite the Judges ultimate ruling in the Jones case of Lewinsky affair irrelevancies, a federal Appeals court has since ruled that the discovered evidence from Lewinsky may indeed have materially affected the outcome of the original Jones case had it been known! Our President not only committed irresponsible acts with an unpaid intern while he was "in loco parentis"(bringing disgust to the hearts of Americans of all stripes), but his clear perjury and obstruction of justice nearly prevented Paula Jones from receiving a single penny. Surveys show that most people now believe the Jones story where they formerly did not. This is probably partly due to the Lewinsky testimony being so similar to the Jones description of his actions. After his years of denying he remembers her- so that he wouldn't have to admit he'd had officers bringing him women, by golly she probably deserves the settlement she got. I've no respect for a man who can't do the time when he's been caught doing the crime- and the Jones case witnesses were strong! His impeccable memory surely did not forget! I believe he choose to deny Jones the satisfaction of an honest answer, allowed her to be trashed publicly for Years instead, and so demonstrates a lack of regard for the obviously negative effect his lies had on this citizen, Mrs. Jones. Clearly, he feels HIS ends- justify the means- this woman be damned. This behavior should certainly be considered impeachable.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next