SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
AMPX 9.145+4.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TheBusDriver who wrote (5074)2/1/1999 7:59:00 AM
From: Scott Pedigo  Read Replies (2) of 17679
 
I trade using Datek and when a stock is non-marginable, their
web pages display an NM next to the quote. I've seen the NM
next to AXC disappear when the price has gone over $5 and then
reappear when the price has been pushed back down, as happened
last week. This indicates to me that rather than Datek having a conservative requirement of the price exceeding $5 for several
days in order for a stock to be marginable, they have a simple
limit in their software.

I looked in the on-line help on the Datek site trying to find
a policy, if any, on marginability. I couldn't find any so far,
but in their Glossary, I found this interesting definition:
NM Abbreviation for Not Meaningful.

Damn! So that's why my investment did so poorly for so long!
AXC was simply not meaningful.

But to return to the topic of the magical $5 price boundry, if
the price continues to hover there, I can imagine that the
volatility could be exacerbated. The stock goes above $5 for
example and some Datek investor loads up on the margin. It drops
back below and the investor gets a margin call, and is forced
to sell (at a loss, no less).

If this really happens, we'd be better off with a stock split
to get the price down in the $2 range again.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext