<< For you to deny that you and your fellow Democrat/liberal friends would would crucify a Republican president that did the same things Clinton did only shows your contempt for the truth. >>
Are you aware of the reasons Nixon was going to get impeached? In his case, it was an obvious and multiple misuses of his powers, and both parties were going to impeach him. There is no comparison between the two. Nixon stepped down because his transgressions were not defendable against impeachment.
Clintons lies about sex do not reach to the level of impeachment.
<< I really don't see what this has to do with WJC committing felonies.>
Oh really!? What felonies has WJC been convicted of? Even after he leaves office the charges are weak. Have you ever heard of "innocent until proven guilty"?
<< The Speaker-Elect had the good sense and decency to resign after his infidelities came to light. >>
I wonder why he didn't have good sense after the 1st time he cheated on his wife? Or, after the 2nd time he cheated? Oh well, it's the new Republican style "Family Values".
<< You seem to think it's okay for the president to engage in a reckless, adulterous affair in the oval office, to lie to his "friends", his cabinet officials and to the American people about it -- and, of course to commit perjury and obstruction of justice in order to avoid taking responsibility for his actions. >>
In a war against the radical republican right, a soldier doesn't ask if the soldier next to him ever sinned. You just hope that he does his job well.
<< That's just pathetic, Robert. >>
Tell me how you really feel about it! <g>
<< His crimes were perjury and obstructing justice, not jaywalking. >>
Not proven and won't be proven.
<< Your assertion that his crimes are minor is disingenuous, at best. >>
His "crimes"? Why are you conservatives so eager to declare someone guilty until proved innocent?
<< Your assertion that he'd be impeached for jaywalking is ludicrous ... >>
I guess you haven't heard the news today! Ken Starr has a secret tape of Clinton jaywalking and leaving the seat up in the white house bathroom.
<< I voted for WJC in 92. >>
Thanks. Can we also count on your vote in 2000?
<< I believed the Bob Dole would be a better president. >>
PLEASE! Let's keep this discussion serious!
<< I support the impeachment of WJC because he's proven, beyond a doubt, that he's a reckless and dangerous man that's willing to subvert the constitution, >>
This is a reckless and dangerous statement. How is he reckless and dangerous? How is he willing to subvert the constitution? These are unsupportable exaggerations, especially since he is not going to be convicted in the Senate, and will never be convicted after he leaves office. Beyond a doubt!? Good grief!
<< Robert, you are either blind or stupid (or both). >>
Let me guess. You are tired after writing such a long note. Monica hasn't returned your call and neither has Paula, so you are feeling a little nasty. But, why take it out on such a nice guy as myself, who is only trying to protect you from the new Republican Party "Family Values"?
<< But you are good at obfuscation and lying. >>
I sense a small compliment in your statement. Thanks. <g>
<< Are you sure you're not one of WJC's paid "spin-meisters"??? >>
I'd jump at the chance!
|
