SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : DELL Bear Thread
DELL 149.13+2.9%Nov 6 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (2409)2/2/1999 2:21:00 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) of 2578
 
Another Rambus/DDR article:

IBM, Reliance lead march toward Direct Rambus alternative
the companies foresee using PC133-standard 133-MHz SDRAMs first, and then double-data-rate (DDR) SDRAMs.
...
a number of Taiwanese chip-set companies said they will exploit the 133-MHz SDRAM architecture to serve low-cost systems.

techweb.com

The project I'm on is a little short of DDR chips... I hear that Rambus chips are also quite scarce, from an interviewing Intel(!) engineer. Both types are being reserved for customers who have a hope in hades of eventually ramping up production to large volumes, so small guys like me get left out. (All is not lost, I've got 4 coming in, and that is enough to get some pretty good testing going.) When everybody knows there is going to be a shortage, everybody tries to get there orders in early, thereby causing a shortage. (Just like Johnny Carson and TP.)

Incidentally, the article notes the problem that the memory makers have guaranteeing hold times, given short access times. When I first found out that the DDRs from Samsung had an access time of 6ns and a hold time of 3ns, I was stunned. I still find it hard to believe that they can spec a chip that tightly over temperature, voltage and process. The ratio of fastest to slowest propagation delays for ICs has been expanding for years, as processes shrink. I guess the memory makers must be going to some sort of compensation circuit. As far as I am concerned, they ought to blow off the hold time, and give the fastest access times possible. It is generally a lot harder to take advantage of long hold times, than short access times...

-- Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext