SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
AMPX 10.94-6.5%1:22 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Stephen M. DeMoss who wrote (5156)2/2/1999 8:15:00 PM
From: stan s.  Read Replies (4) of 17679
 
Hi Stephen, there are instances where gaps are left unfilled but it's not common on a percentage basis. I could not (with a straight face anyway) tell you that if MSFT has a gap at 11 dating back to 1994 that's it's gonna fill it.

As in any TA you have to use your head and remain IMHO a bit flexible.
The smaller the gap and the farther away...the less psychological impact it has. A large recent gap will exert more pull.

I gave a quick look at Dell's very recent chart and the only unfilled recent gap I noticed was on 12/17/98. I'm not counting gaps in the last week or two.

Would I worry about it now? No. Am I sure it won't get filled? Nope

Here's a short mention of gaps (windows) by the way,
why.net

As far as the gap that AXC has beginning at 2 5/8. In a stock split of 5-1
the gap from point would simply be at .53 rather than 2.68.

Would I sell based on AXC's gap...No...but I might add if it touched 2 5/8 and held...it also might allay my fears if (when) I saw it heading down...as it was this morning.

One reason to look at gaps is it often can keep you from panicking.
Often when a stock seem to take an irrational downturn...it is simply filling a gap...people love to blame those instances on MM's (Nasdaq's stocks)...sometimes unjustly.

We won't even mention AXC's gap from 2.00 on the 22nd. VBG

Good luck,

Stan

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext