Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (31830)	2/3/1999 9:12:00 PM
From: JBL	Read Replies (1) of 67261

"Yes, Jordan may well have lied, but that's not exactly unusual. Expecting a confidant of the President to assist the Starr Inquisition in its careful construction of the one correct version of the "truth" is dubious." Daniel, This all this debate is about in the end. You state its OK to lie to defend Clinton given the circumstances (lying about sex, political trap), and I say you can't. If it's OK to lie to defend Clinton, could he and those who accept lying as a justified means have lied about being set up ? Or were they telling the truth then ? I am sorry that you cannot understand this most simple concept, that truth in Judicial proceedings is essential to the survival and functioning of a Democracy. Go visit countries of the world where corruption is an accepted practice, and you'll understand what I'm talking about.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next