They still don't get it.
The WAVX call letters are floating across the bottom of CNBC… Somebody's paying more attention. Officially, there are no analysts following WAVX and reporting back to ZACKS. Unofficially, many are doing their homework AND reporting to their institutional investment firms a simpler solution to securing network economic activity; something better than relying upon layers of firewalls and centralized servers. What's happening? What's with this "trusted client" thing? Can't the complexity, security, and constraints of network bandwidth for the entire world be taken care of by IBM servers, software, and INTC chips? Not likely. In the ever increasing xchange of information age, IBM and INTC are just small fish in a big ocean of digital devices that will network the planet just fine with or without them. The NET is Big! Bigger than any one Country - let alone one company. Server functions must be transferred to the personal client devices that will communicate with each other and overlapping networks. WAVX chips enable PC devices to provide a very wide range of security functions, digitally distributed transactions, and protected applications to the Net's converging medium of electronic information xchange gadgetry. WAVX chips will be an essential element to enable the new generation of commercial information xchange that can execute on client-side devices. Wall Street analysts may walk away for a while, but they'll be back as the trusted client system's revenue generating and apportioning potential $$$$$ are attested to by content providers and happy, smiling OEM's down to a fraction of a cent.
Move over little e-Bay,
Marty |
