Michael,
You wrote:
"If you research GreenPeace's position you will learn that they believe GES have not been proven to be safe or unsafe. Until that happens they urge consumers to be educated and urge the manufacturers to offer a choice and segragate GES's from normal grains."
That sounds like GreenPeace needs to be convinced that GES have been either proven safe or shown to be unsafe, and that until they are convinced, they will continue to, as you say, "urge consumers to be educated." To date, their "educational" system has consisted of disrupting legitimate business operations in a fashion such as the demonstrations at Nestle, in which at least one office of the company was shut down as the demonstrators blocked the entrance.
GreenPeace, in their statements to the press, cited "unknown health risks." My question is, what risk? If there is such a risk, then after more than two decades of research, it should have been revealed.
Don't get me wrong--I do welcome your comments. But if I disagree with your ideas, you'll hear about it. |
