As I've said, Daniel, on the same basis that you draw conclusions about the lawyers, I have an open-and-shut obstruction case against Clinton. No need for a trial, let's throw the book at him.
In any event, it doesn't matter, because even if it were a trap, Clinton shouldn't have been in a position to fall into it. You see, in order for the conspiracy to mean much, you have to suppose that they could count on Clinton being a philanderer and a perjurer. If they could count on his disreputable, reckless, and illegal behavior, then his fitness for office reasonably comes into question, whatever sins others may have to answer for. |
