Winspear Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mineman who wrote (13999)	2/8/1999 7:40:00 AM
From: Sapper	Read Replies (2) of 26850

<They therefore were not looking for evidence in inclusions and growth planes to determine if all the stones came from the same location.> Can you not read? See the last NR! Quote "The main conclusions of his report are as follows: The various physical characteristics exhibited by the three large gem diamonds (10.82, 8.42, and 6.04 carats) recovered from the kimberlite are completely consistent with those observed in smaller stones from all size fractions. There is a strong correlation of morphological characteristics between diamonds recovered from each of the two sample sites." Unquote In other words, an independent expert has looked for evidence of different signatures and found none. Your concern is no longer an issue..... Sapper

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next