International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Krikor who wrote (2027)	2/6/1997 2:42:00 AM
From: Randy Giese	of 35569

The 500kg tests are the only ones that matter. Thats why I'm so surprised that IPM would issue a news release raising everyone's hope when in fact the small scale test's performed so far mean nothing if the bulk tests fail. It's already happening here on this thread--"...its already scaled XX times so its natural to assume it will scale XX fewer times". If IPM is working under the same assumption then I think it is dangerous and undesirable. I have them sized up as a very conservative company in reading their news releases. Perhaps, I am wrong. We are only talking approx. two weeks here where IPM could have run some initial bulk tests and then issued the same release as they did on Feb. 4. Are they that concerned about maintaining the price of the stock over this relatively short time period? They certainly weren't overdue for an update.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next