SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : LastShadow's Position Trading

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jay Lyons who wrote (8234)2/10/1999 12:57:00 PM
From: LastShadow  Read Replies (1) of 43080
 
Yes, with both my Vanguard (one is a self-directed IRA, the other is a straight Brokerage)and Fidelity accounts, a fund redemption of 1% is charged if the fund is outside of Vanguard's/Fidelity's family. If you were to buy and sell say, a Rydex Ursa or Nova fund from your Fidelity account, you would have a similar charge.

The reason I account for the 1% is that many people may wish to enter those funds from their IRA/whatever, that may be outside that family. And i did not want that cost to be overlooked. Also, other than ProFunds, there are several high performing funds that work better for uptrends than the ProFunds (notably Putnam OTC, Fidelity FDCPX, one Dreyfus, one Northern fund, etc). None perform better in downturns than the ProFund Ultra Bear, Short and Ultra Short, however. The potential gains from funds outside of any one family far outweigh the 1% fee, so my concern was which Institution allowed trading (phone and online) in the largest number of funds other than their own. Vanguard won.

ls
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext