SFLK SOFTLINK INC. Should the SEC halt this one? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SFLK SOFTLINK INC. Should the SEC halt this one?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Next 10PreviousNext

To: StockDung who wrote ()	2/10/1999 8:18:00 PM
From: Eric Fader	Read Replies (1) of 48

Any company that intends to use its stock as "currency" in doing acquisitions, compensating its employees with stock, stock option plans, etc., owes it to its existing shareholders to get the company's story out to the public so the stock will be properly valued in the public marketplace. Especially for an underfollowed OTC-BB stock, if that means hiring a promoter, that's fine with me and with the SEC so long as it's properly disclosed. In Softlink's case, it is. If anyone has a problem with this or doesn't understand the point, please let me know and I'd be glad to amplify. I'm an attorney with much familiarity with securities law matters, but in the case of SFLK I am strictly an investor and cannot speak for or vouch for the company. The bottom line is, please don't read inflammatory statements like Flodyie's initial post on this unnecessary new thread without reviewing the entire MAIN thread for SFLK. You'll read about the company's products from people who have used them and can confirm that they are real. If you think I was foolish to invest in SFLK (at an average cost of $2.15/share <g>), or to continue holding it, please let me know! Should the SEC halt trading in a little company whose only sin was hiring an overly aggressive PR firm? -- what do YOU think? Thanks- Eric

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Next 10PreviousNext