SFLK Message Board - Msg: 7766464

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SFLK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric Fader who wrote (555)	2/10/1999 9:33:00 PM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (2) of 1591

<<<<<<<<< I realized that that question could have been intended to elicit a response that would get me in trouble>>>>>> It wasn't. I am sure you realize that if your firm did represent any of the companies to whose boards you post you would have an obligation to disclose that. Ethically if not legally. I was only looking for a truthful answer, not looking to get you in trouble. I thought the rest of my post woiuld have indicated my feelings toward communicating with someone obviously more educated than me in securites law. Now I haven't finished looking for info on this company, Considering the thread header had an edited disclosure on it and it was not done by the PR company (that I believe 100%) I would guess someone who stood to benefit from a good pump was probably behind this thread. Obviously that by itself does not make the company a bad company, but check the chart from the time this thread was started. Looks like a prtetty successful PUMP at that. Does that necessarily mean the dump come next? And to Francois, what was wrong with 532 ? Get off my back or you'll force the BEAR to get Grizzly

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next