FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

FTEL 1.220

+42.8%

12:14 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mark garner who wrote (40748)	2/10/1999 9:57:00 PM
From: Seth L.	Read Replies (2) of 41046

Mark not to belabor this point but since I feel guilty in bringing up this topic on another thread I feel important to say the following. I believe that both Pat and Techie on the Bull made excellent arguments as to why no naming in todays release. My frustration is the how poorly the releases are written. Granted it retrospect I was incorrect in my yelling about not naming names but you stated this they have new orders.who cares from who, as long as the from who is a PAYING customer? agreed but sell the urgency to other corps sitting on the fence that our product is cost effective, needed, wanted, and reliable. Why is the unamed company using FTEL? What services are they supplying? Why FTEL?????? answer these questions for the reader do not create questions for the reader. By the way it has been for better than 6-8 months the FTEL policy only to announce information that has been signed sealed and delivered so IMHO if you have to wait to announce it make it hurt the shorts when you do. Sethy

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next