Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (33517)	2/11/1999 5:28:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Yes, well, it would be asking too much to even read all of this thread. But you could read samplings of posts in time frames surrounding key turn of event dates. I love the fact that I can read junk mail on stocks- read descriptions of stocks where the name is not revealed....then come here and search and often instantly discover which stock is so "great" and often have a more realistic discussion of the company at hand. If I'm blessed with some Schuh or other reading my post I'm sure I'll be blasted....and for what it's worth, you are exactly right about these guys...they do ignore salient points and attack on offbase issues. I can't help but remember how point by point I learned the value of freedom. My main "teacher" wouldn't let me skip a point. I had to reconcile my then socialist beliefs with certain truths he would win agreement on. Then he would show me where his point fit up against my beliefs- force me to see a contradiction and decide what made sense and what didn't. If I agreed to this...then how could I believe that? I fought fiercely- much like leftists here! But I found that the socialist view ran out of arguments- as it does here. Freedom/capitalism always had the last word- and there was nothing more available in socialism/leftism to logically refute the individual points- comes a level of argument where leftists just revert to previous arguments you've already covered. They don't quite open their minds enough to compare points in an unbiased manner- they eventually just leave new points behind for what's previously convinced them. It's like talking to a brick wall if you can't get them to stick to points. When you can(seldome) they often convert. I'm sure they feel the same way. But looking at government, the rate of conversions from left to right has always been much higher than the reverse. I really dont' think anyone planned it that way, it's just, ---logical. :-) In the end...the record stands, and I'm confident the posts full of vitriole from the left here will look far more baseless and useless than those of the hated Rev. Pilch. I mean, REAL points made could be listed..then percentages of those points addressed within replies could be shown. You could do this for each side. The left on this thread would lose big time. It'd be friggin' scientific! Just look at a recent post to you. It actually picks out all your points one by one...but this wouldn't count for your foe, because each of your points is answered with the identical phrase..."Ok, if you say so"--which words clearly bear no consequence upon your points; in no way can anyone say they add or detract from you points. It's pure puffery without logical relation what-so-ever. It's a favorite resort of leftists here. Not that the right is innocent...they just have SO much freedom to be lax, in the light of the abundant unanswered points they've already made. Oh boy! This one REALLY could do it! hehehe.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next