Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 41.41

+2.2%

Dec 5 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (73378)	2/11/1999 7:20:00 AM
From: Haim Barad	Read Replies (1) of 186894

You are responding to this message from Scumbria on Feb 11 1999 2:14AM EST Ten, My point was that Intel's internet performance claims are silly. There is no need to buy an expensive microprocessor to do a simple task like compression/decompression. Just for arguments sake... compression/decompression can be much more abstract than simple encoding/decoding schemes. Take for example real-time NURBS tessellation of 3D models. That'll be a form of data compression that I doubt your FPGA chip will do so well... I might have to transmit several hundred control points (NURBS data) instead of several thousand vertices (polygon data). If I can tessellate on my local PC (let's say you might need a more powerful one to do this...), then that sounds like a 10X compression of data that has to travel across the internet... all without changing your Internet Service Provider, modem, etc... And my NURBS algorithm has plenty of other features: level of detail control, deformable surfaces, etc... Just an example... Haim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next